This is far too complex. Let's start with just acknowledging the basic examples [0].
[0] https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers/issues/866
This is far too complex. Let's start with just acknowledging the basic examples [0].
[0] https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers/issues/866
What a weird thread. Who posts an AI prompt as a source of truth
Oh man you'd be shocked on Twitter. So many people have outsourced to AIs as arbiters of truth and reality. The number of "@grok is this true" "@perplexityai is this real" that pepper any post en masse is shocking and dismaying to me. In what I suppose shouldn't be a surprise but still stings, people seem to be offloading critical thinking and examination onto LLMs first, with usage as a tool for gathering context/additional points of research to go explore/hyper-efficient search engine etc. coming in a sadly distant next/N-th place.
Why do you assume they are using it that way and not ultimately using it "as a tool for gathering context/additional points of research"?
Because they say "is this true" and "is this real," not, "provide context" or "where can I go to learn more", and the answer quality reflects that.
Is this true and is this real is just how people talk. Human conversation isn't so contextually strict as programming language.
The sentence "Even AI gets it right..." implies they do not think it's a source of truth, they think it's embarrassing for it to get it right and a human not to.
But AI didn't get it right. That's the point, isn't it? The screenshot in the link shows an analysis that's based on a set of invalid/incorrect assumptions.
Specifically, MCP servers are expected to run in a trusted environment by definition. So, MCP servers can safely treat their input as trusted, as well. At least, that's what the spec says.
This.
I did out of curiosity. Remember that Github feeds AI, new developers use AI to generate code, now what is the lowest bar of asking AI "if this code is safe".
Ad populum fallacy will now be replaced by Ad AI said so.... the funny part is the "Sources??" people are some of the most reliant on it
Probably same people who discuss war plans on Signal.