> "The authors acknowledge support from NIH Training Grant No. T32GM145452 (A.T.G., C.S.O., and Z.L.), NIH Training Grant No. T15LM007056-37 (J.A.L.), and the High Performance Computing facilities operated by Yale's Center for Research Computing."
Well, NIH training grants aren't going anywhere, so far as I know, and the high-performance computing facilities may or may not be affected by a cut in indirects. If they are affected, one reasonably has to ask: what line items made it past the cut? It's a more productive framing of the question.
Either way, you can't just leap to the conclusion that everything you like will be gone.
> especially if they don't sing ideologically pure songs for dear Leader.
I think it's possible that you're exaggerating.
Lots of things are possible while clearly not true, and that's one of them.
Well, pretty much everything in the comment I replied to is untrue, so technically the entire comment falls in that category.
No, everything you responded to was true, and nothing you said was true.