Again. It's not an argument. It's a misleading intuition pump. Or a failure of philosophy to filter away bullshit, if you will.

Please, read again what I wrote.

Regarding "larger than Universe": "the argument" places no restrictions on runtime or space complexity of the algorithm. It's just another intuitive notion: syntactic processing is manageable by a single person, other kinds of processing aren't.

I'm sorry for the confrontational tone, but I really dismayed that this thing keeps floating and keeps being regarded as a foundational result.