Can you write down the actual argument?
It seems to be plausible, to me, given enough parrots.
Novel utterances happen all the damn time. See https://venturebeat.com/business/15-of-all-google-searches-a... for tangential evidence.
Edit: actually that looks like it's just an offhand mention of Google's initial report, but I don't really feel like spending more time tracking down details to rebut so silly a claim.
Unique gibberish and spelling errors also count as a “unique search” so I don’t see how it relates.
Do you have an argument that makes sense?
This is embarrassing, but I hastily misread your comment as saying something it didn’t say. So just disregard my comment altogether!
Novel utterances happen all the damn time. See https://venturebeat.com/business/15-of-all-google-searches-a... for tangential evidence.
Edit: actually that looks like it's just an offhand mention of Google's initial report, but I don't really feel like spending more time tracking down details to rebut so silly a claim.
Unique gibberish and spelling errors also count as a “unique search” so I don’t see how it relates.
Do you have an argument that makes sense?
This is embarrassing, but I hastily misread your comment as saying something it didn’t say. So just disregard my comment altogether!