This analogy is so thin and your statements are so general that you're basically saying nothing in so many words. We should be critical of new technologies and endeavor to understand how they best suit us. The purported use cases of a spellchecker and an LLM completely differ. Their modalities differ. Their effect differ. Their implications for society differ.

Handwaving away any attempt at analysis and criticism or developing nuance and understanding is even lazier than my original snark comment.

The locomotive is an amazing invention that brought a lot of benefit to society. It also brought the train crash and radical transformation of various other social practices and functions. No technology is simply a "productivity enhancer" and nothing else. They all bring all sorts of new dynamics and unintended consequences.