I think this is good evidence that people's jobs are not being replaced by AI, because no AI would give the product a confusing name like "new Claude 3.5 Sonnet".
I think this is good evidence that people's jobs are not being replaced by AI, because no AI would give the product a confusing name like "new Claude 3.5 Sonnet".
I wonder why they didn't choose a "point update" scheme, like bumping it up to v3.6, for example. I agree, the naming is super confusing.
Maybe they should’ve asked Claude to generate a better name. Very dangerous to live in your own hyper focused bubble while trying to build a mass market product.
Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic are responsibly scaling their models by confusing their customers into using the wrong ones.
When AGI finally is launched, adoption will be responsibly slowed because it is called something like "new new Gemini Giga 12.9.2xo IT" and users will have to select it from dozens of similar names.