Azure Blob storage is considerably cheaper than S3 or Google, for example. (Not cheaper than Cloudflare, but that one doesn't have a supported FUSE driver). I've been trying hard to find instances where they lost data and could not.
Them offering the ~same product but cheaper is good.
iirc Blob Storage is tied to a "storage account" that has throughput limits that can't easily be changed so it has a performance ceiling
>Azure Blob storage is considerably cheaper than S3 or Google, for example
Really? I did a quick search and azure charges 2.08 cents per GB for "hot" storage compared to 2.3 cents for aws. That's not that big of a difference. Am I missing something?