Point me to human intelligence. Not a mimicry of intelligence, actual intelligence. No, solipsism doesn't count.
Humans learn dynamically and can apply patterns to problems across domains. I think these are a couple key capabilities we have that LLM's don't have (for example).
>Humas learn dynamically
In-context learning (Few Shot Prompting) is absolutely demonstrable by LLMs since GPT 3.5 at least.
Yes, ICL demonstrates some capability, but is still extremely limited compared to a human's ability. It's an interesting baby step at this point.
Why do you think only LLMs are the pinnacle of AI today?
> Why do you think only LLMs are the pinnacle of AI today?
I don't think that but you're right that I was partially countering a pro-LLM argument that was not there.
It was a bit of a knee jerk reaction due to the number of people overstating current LLM's capabilities here on HN.
Humans learn dynamically and can apply patterns to problems across domains. I think these are a couple key capabilities we have that LLM's don't have (for example).
>Humas learn dynamically
In-context learning (Few Shot Prompting) is absolutely demonstrable by LLMs since GPT 3.5 at least.
Yes, ICL demonstrates some capability, but is still extremely limited compared to a human's ability. It's an interesting baby step at this point.
Why do you think only LLMs are the pinnacle of AI today?
> Why do you think only LLMs are the pinnacle of AI today?
I don't think that but you're right that I was partially countering a pro-LLM argument that was not there.
It was a bit of a knee jerk reaction due to the number of people overstating current LLM's capabilities here on HN.