But the sentence right after undermines it.
> However, this does not explain why the read bandwidth is stuck at 2 GB/s.
Faster read speeds would give them a more enticing product without wearing drives out.
But the sentence right after undermines it.
> However, this does not explain why the read bandwidth is stuck at 2 GB/s.
Faster read speeds would give them a more enticing product without wearing drives out.
They may be limiting the read artificially to increase your resource utilization else where. If you have disk bottleneck then you would be more likely to use more instances. It is still about the bottom line.
That could be. But it's a completely different reason. If you summarize everything as "bottom line", you lose all the valuable information.