We get urban sprawl and people building towns and homes in wildly inappropriate areas, such as forests. Which is why you see people's house going up in flames due to wildfire.
Meanwhile, human habitation continues to be a very small portion of land usage. We like living in metropolitan areas for a reason.
Anyway, we get a lot of benefit from immigration. I don't suggest we stop, but rather that we should adjust to demand. Nimbyism and zoning is still a problem especially with urban sprawl.
> Anyway, we get a lot of benefit from immigration.
Sure. But that doesn't mean that there's no tradeoff. Be aware of it.
We can't really talk about tradeoff of immigration if we have grossly inefficient land usage patterns and the ability to construct enough home if we so choose.