There is always that kid in the class that Googles the question and then prints out the first page as their assignment submission.
There is always that kid in the class that Googles the question and then prints out the first page as their assignment submission.
Which in no way supports or defends or justifies any of your ignorant fallacious attacks on science, tired false equivalencies about religion, and nasty ad-hominem attacks on scientists.
Plus it totally contradicts you assertions above about the usefulness of Google and ChatGPT. Flip, flop, flip, flop!
You could at least have the integrity and intellectual honesty to reply directly to the actual real live scientist, a professional quantum physicist, who took the time to correctly rebut your wild conspiracy theories and gross misunderstandings of science, but you chose not to, and the crickets are still chirping away, awaiting your response.
But your lack of a response to him says so much more about you than your response possibly could (short of an admission that you are wrong and an apology for attacking scientists and a promise to do better next time).
Do you see the irony? Nope. You just contradicted yourself and flip-flopped yet again, reflexively clinging to your anti-scientific conspiracy theories even tighter, as revenge for being called out with the facts by a professional scientist, just like any dime-a-dozen foaming-at-the-mouth Q-Anon freak would. That only makes you even more wrong and ridiculous looking, and doesn't hurt or fool anybody else.
Look at your own obsessive posts.
"what’s surprising is that physicists seem to be O.K. with not understanding the most important theory they have."
Sean Carroll (2019): https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/07/opinion/sunday/quantum-ph...
I don't think the guy you are at war with deserves so much attention and energy on your part. Not only is the point he's making not that different from what I linked above, although I reckon he gave it an arrogant spin, but the way you react somehow vindicates the parallels he established between science and religion. Not sure how Q-Anon is related to all of this.