> Making memory isn’t super hard.

Then why do only 3 companies make it?

Bankruptcy risks.

When Samsung had to sell memory at a loss after COVID, no one came to save them. They buffered their memory division using profits from their other businesses. That’s how Samsung survives memory downturns.

According to some stories, this is how Samsung convinced TSMC to not enter the memory business - that you need a nation or other lines of business to prevent bankruptcies.

The market has stabilized to 3 players.

...And why do they go bankrupt?

Because it's an incredibly capital intensive process, involving billions of dollars of investment into manufacturing infrastructure.

That is to say, making memory is quite hard.

The technical process of making memory is relatively easy. Hence, it is a commodity.

I didn’t say owning a memory business is easy.

You’re confusing two independent things. There are simple processes that are extremely capital intensive with long lead times and then there are complex processes that require lots of R&D and industry secrets. Memory is the former in the chip world.

Other examples from outside of tech of easy but capital intensive processes are power generation and railroads. Very easy to do, but easy to end up broken by overbuilding for demand that fails to materialize or stay stable for the duration of your financing.

Making the memory can be much easier than predicting future demand.

Placing the bet isn't as hard as making an accurate prediction.