> 1. It tries to do too many things. Please just do one thing and do it well. It's simultaneously trying to replace pip, pyenv, virtualenv, and ruff in one command.

I think there are more cases where pip, pyenv, and virtualenv are used together than not. It makes sense to bundle the features of the three into one. uv does not replace ruff.

> 2. You end up needing to use `uv pip` so it's not even a full replacement for pip.

uv pip is there for compatibility and to facilitate migration but once you are full on the uv workflow you rarely need `uv pip` if ever

> 3. It does not play well with Docker.

In what sense?

> 4. It adds more complexity. You end up needing to understand all of these new environmental variables: `UV_TOOL_BIN_DIR`, `UV_SYSTEM_PYTHON`, `UV_LINK_MODE`, etc.

You don't need to touch them at all