> We don't call Google a monopoly, because there is Apple We call that a duopoly, which is similarly bad as a monopoly.

It’s slightly different because apple is a hardware manufacturer primarily that happens to have its own OS, whereas there are many other phone manufacturers, and not all of them even use google’s version of android/linux on them, nor have to in the future. And sure google makes hardware too but they’re small relatively speaking.

I guess what I’m saying is it’s less of a duopoly traditionally speaking because as companies they build primarily different things.